Unacceptable Generalizations in Arguments on Legal Evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Children and Advertising - Some Perspectives on the Relevant Legal Arguments
2 Arguments Found in Legislative Instruments of Various Types ............ 438 2.1 Regulations of Various Types .................................................. 438 2.2 The Convention on the Rights of the Child .................................. 438 2.3 The Main Swedish Rules Dealing with Children and Advertising........ 439 2.4 The EC Rules ......................................................
متن کاملExtracting Legal Arguments from Forensic Bayesian Networks
Recent developments in the forensic sciences have confronted the field of legal reasoning with the new challenge of reasoning under uncertainty. Forensic results come with uncertainty and are described in terms of likelihood ratios and random match probabilities. The legal field is unfamiliar with numerical valuations of evidence, which has led to confusion and in some cases to serious miscarri...
متن کاملA General Structure for Legal Arguments
A Bayesian network (BN) is a graphical model of uncertainty that is especially well-suited to legal arguments. It enables us to visualise and model dependencies between different hypotheses and pieces of evidence and to calculate the revised probability beliefs about all uncertain factors when any piece of new evidence is presented. Although BNs have been widely discussed and recently used in t...
متن کاملA General Structure for Legal Arguments About Evidence Using Bayesian Networks
A Bayesian network (BN) is a graphical model of uncertainty that is especially well suited to legal arguments. It enables us to visualize and model dependencies between different hypotheses and pieces of evidence and to calculate the revised probability beliefs about all uncertain factors when any piece of new evidence is presented. Although BNs have been widely discussed and recently used in t...
متن کاملIncomplete Arguments in Legal Discourse: a Case Study
This paper investigates to what extent natural-language arguments in legal discourse can be regarded as containing unexpressed premises. In a study of a Dutch civil dispute it is found that many seemingly incomplete arguments can plausibly be regarded as containing an unstated premise, especially statutory rules, legal classification rules, and empirical commonsense generalisations. However, se...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Argumentation
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0920-427X,1572-8374
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-016-9399-1